Acil serviste triyajda bibliyometrik vizyon
Triyajda bibliyometrik bir vizyon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8200982Anahtar Kelimeler:
bibliyomterik metod- triyaj- acil tıpÖzet
Giriş: Triyaj acil serviste vazgeçilmez bir süreçtir. Araştırmacılara bazı faydalı tavsiyeler vermek amacıyla, triyaj araştırmasındaki sıcak noktalara ve geleceğe yönelik beklentilere bakmak için bu çalışmada bibliyometrik ve görsel analiz yapılmıştır.
Yöntemler: Bu çalışma, iki ana kullanımı olan bibliyometrik yöntemlere dayanmaktadır: bilimsel analiz ve haritalama. Verilere tek bir günde ulaşıldı, 15 Haziran 2022. Başlıkta veritabanına girilen arama anahtar kelimeleri triyaj ve acil servis veya acil servis ve belge türü makale idi. 1970'den 2021'e kadar veriler Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection veritabanından toplandı. Elde edilen veriler ileri analizler için Excel 2010 ve VOSviewer programlarına aktarılmıştır.
Bulgular: WOS veritabanında başlık kelimeleri aranarak ilk olarak 1970–2021 yılları arasında toplam 1538 yayına ulaşılmıştır. Bu dokümanlardan bilimsel değerinin yüksek olması nedeniyle (n=999; %64,95) sadece makaleler değerlendirmeye alınmıştır. İlk makale 1970 yılında yayınlandı. 2000'li yıllardan itibaren yayın sayısında zirve yaşandı. 2021 yılında en fazla yayın yayınlandı. En üretken ülkeler Amerika Birleşik Devletleri (ABD) (n=317; %31,73), Kanada (n=87; %8,71) ve Avustralya (n=79; 7,91) oldu. %). En verimli kurumlar Avrupa Araştırma Üniversiteleri Birliği (LERU) (n=82; %8,21), Harvard Üniversitesi (n=45; %4,51) ve California Üniversitesi sistemiydi (n=34, %3,40). Makale başına en çok atıf Kanada yayınlarına ait olsa da, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri en çok yayına ve en yüksek H-Index'e sahipti.
Sonuçlar: Bu, yayınlanmış acil durum triyaj literatürü hakkında kapsamlı açıklamalar sunan ilk bibliyometrik çalışmadır. Acil durum triyajıyla ilgili makalelerin sayısı zamanla arttı, ancak bu alanda çok az araştırma var.
İndirmeler
Referanslar
McCann JC, Ames BN. Adaptive dysfunction of selenoproteins from the perspective of the triage theory: why modest selenium deficiency may increase risk of diseases of aging. FASEB J. 2011;25:1793–1814. https://doi.org/ 10.1096/fj.11-180885.
McHugh M, Tanabe P, McClelland M, Khare RK. More patients are triaged using the emergency severity index than any other triage acuity system in the United States. Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19:106–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01240.x.
Ng CJ, Hsu KH, Kuan JT, Chiu TF, Chen WK, Lin HJ, et al. Comparison between Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale and Taiwan Triage System in emergency departments. J Formos Med Assoc. 2010;109(11):828–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-6646(10)60128-137.
Murray MJ. The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: a Canadian perspective on emergency department triage. Emerg. Med. 2003;15:6–10. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00400.x.
Ganley L, Gloster A. An overview of triage in the emergency department. Nurs. Stand. 2011;26:49–56. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2011.11.26.12.49.c8829.
Fitzgerald G, Jelinek GA, Scott D, Gerdtz MF. Republished paper: Emergency department triage revisited. Postgrad Med J. 2010;86(1018):502–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2009.077081rep. https://doi.org/.
Web of Science. Access date: 15 June 2022. Accessed from: https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/web-of-science/ .
Small H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1973;24(4):265–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406. https://doi.org/.
Kessler MM. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation. 1963;14(1):10–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103. https://doi.org/.
Callon M, Courtial JP, Turner WA, Bauin S. From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information. 1983;22(2):191–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901883022002003.
Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:16569–72. https://doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.0507655102.
Doja A, Eady K, Horsley T, Bould MD, Victor JC, Sampson M. The h-index in medical education: an analysis of medical education journal editorial boards. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:251. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-014-0251-8. https://doi.org/
Slater RR. Triage nurse in the emergency department. Am J of Nurs. 1970; 70:127–9. https://doi.org/10.2307/3421031.
Hamm CW, Goldmann BU, Heeschen C, Kreymann G, Berger J, Meinertz T. Emergency room triage of patients with acute chest pain by means of rapid testing for cardiac troponin T or troponin I. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(23):1648–53. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199712043372302. https://doi.org/
Eitel DR, Travers DA, Rosenau AM, Gilboy N, Wuerz RC. The emergency severity index triage algorithm version 2 is reliable and valid. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10(10):1070-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553–2712.2003.tb00577.x.
Molyneux E, Ahmad S, Robertson A. Improved triage and emergency care for children reduces inpatient mortality in a resource-constrained setting. Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84(4):314–9. https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.04.019505.
Beveridge R, Ducharme J, Janes L, Beaulieu S, Walter S. Reliability of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: interrater agreement. Ann Emerg Med. 1999 ;34(2):155–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70223-4.
Han JH, Wilson A, Vasilevskis EE, Shintani A, Schnelle JF, Dittus RS, et al. Diagnosing delirium in older emergency department patients: validity and reliability of the delirium triage screen and the brief confusion assessment method. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;62(5):457–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.05.003.
Lima FO, Silva GS, Furie KL, Frankel MR, Lev MH, Camargo ÉC, et al. Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination: A Simple and Accurate Prehospital Scale to Detect Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes. Stroke. 2016;47(8):1997–2002. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013301.
Larsen GY, Mecham N, Greenberg R. An emergency department septic shock protocol and care guideline for children initiated at triage. Pediatrics. 2011;127(6):e1585–92. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010–3513.
Widgren BR, Jourak M. Medical Emergency Triage and Treatment System (METTS): a new protocol in primary triage and secondary priority decision in emergency medicine. J Emerg Med. 2011;40(6):623–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.04.003.
Pearson SD, Goldman L, Orav EJ, Guadagnoli E, Garcia TB, Johnson PA, et al. Triage decisions for emergency department patients with chest pain: do physicians' risk attitudes make the difference? J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10(10):557–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02640365.
Horng S, Sontag DA, Halpern Y, Jernite Y, Shapiro NI, Nathanson LA. Creating an automated trigger for sepsis clinical decision support at emergency department triage using machine learning. PLOS One. 2017;12(4):e0174708. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174708.
Dolan B, Holt L. Accident & emergency: theory into practice. 3rd ed. Baillière Tindall: Edinburgh; 2013.
Tam HL, Chung SF, Lou CK. A review of triage accuracy and future direction. BMC Emerg Med. 2018;18(1):58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-018-0215-0.
Parenti N, Reggiani MLB, Iannone P, Percudani D, Dowding D. A systematic review on the validity and reliability of an emergency department triage scale, the Manchester triage system. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51(7):1062–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.01.013.
Ebrahimi M, Heydari A, Mazlom R, Mirhaghi A. The reliability of the Australasian triage scale: a meta-analysis. World J Emerg Med. 2015;6(2):94–9. https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2015.02.002.
Mirhaghi A, Heydari A, Mazlom R, Hasanzadeh F. Reliability of the emergency severity index: meta-analysis. SQU Medical Journal. 2015;15(1):e71–7. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
Shi J, Shi S, Yuan G, Jia Q, Shi S, Zhu X, et al. Bibliometric analysis of chloride channel research (2004-2019). Channels (Austin). 2020;14(1):393-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/19336950.2020.1835334.
Tahmaz A, Oğuz Mızrakçı S, Alkan S. Research trends on Legionellosis. J CLIN MED KAZ. 2022;19(2):29–32. https://doi.org/10.23950/jcmk/11933.
Küçük U, Alkan S, Uyar C. Bibliometric analysis of infective endocarditis. Iberoam J Med. 2021;3(4):350–5. https://doi.org/10.53986/ibjm.2021.0055.
Şahin S. Overview on Vascular Surgery. BSJ Health Sci. 2022;5(3):365–9. https://doi.org/10.19127/bshealthscience.1076552.
Cinpolat HY. A bibliometric analysis of global research trends on biomarker studies in Alzheimer’s disease. D J Med Sci. 2022;8(1):5–10. https://doi.org/10.5606/fng.btd.2022.91.
Alkan S, Dindar Demiray EK, Yıldız E, Özlü C. Analysis of scientific publications on Acinetobacter bacteremia in Web of Science. Infect Dis Clin Microbiol. 2021;3:39–44. https://doi.org/10.36519/idcm.2021.37.
Gürler M, Alkan S, Özlü C, Aydın B. Collaborative Network Analysis and Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Diabetic Foot Infection. J Biotechinol & Strategic Health Res. 2021; 5(3): 194–9. https://doi.org/10.34084/bshr.993099.
Kokulu K, Mutlu H, Sert ET. Scientific Publication Productivity of Emergency Physicians: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Last Decade. J Emerg Med. 2019;57(1):13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.03.021. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
Cetin M, Long B, Gottlieb M. A 10-year bibliometric analysis of publications in emergency medicine. Am J Emerg Med. 2022;58:215–22. https://doi.org10.1016/j.ajem.2022.06.016. Epub ahead of print.
Nees Jan van E, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146
İndir
Yayınlanmış
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Lisans
Telif Hakkı (c) 2023 Chronicles of Precision Medical Researchers
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıtır.
