Bibliometric Analysis On Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing

A Bibliometric Evaluation of Global Publication Trends, Citation Analysis, and Research Collaborations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19242368

Keywords:

Bibliometrics, publications, non-invasive prenatal testing

Abstract

Aim: The study aimed to analyze and assess the global research development, collaborative network, prestigious literature and tendency of themes about Non-invasive prenatal testing(SDisease) (NIPT). 

Materials and Methods: A total of 1639 scientific publications between the years 2011-2025 were examined in this study from the Web Science (WoS) database databases. Country and institutional collaborations, co-citation networks, and keyword collocations were visualized for the data analysis in VOSviewer.

Results The publications in the area of NIPT were found to have increased over years. The PR China ranked the first both in terms of publications (n=384), with United States of America and United Kingdom being the countries with most significant international collaboration networks included respectively (n=206) and (n=199). The journal Prenatal Diagnosis contributed most, with 171 publications and 4,243 citations. Results Analysis of the Keywords showed that research interest has shifted from simple aneuploidy screening to technical (fetal fraction, mosaicism and next-generation sequencing) as well as social aspects (genetic counseling and ethical issues).

Conclusion: The NIPT field is a very active and mature area of research with an increasing volume of interest. The People’s Republic of China is the largest volume contributor, US and UK are in the hub of international collaboration and scientific influence. The emphasis in the field has changed from pure screening to more challenging issues like fetal fraction, mosaicism, genetic counseling and ethics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Jayashankar SS, Nasaruddin ML, Hassan MF, et al. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): reliability, challenges, and future directions. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13(15):2570.

2. Carbone L, Cariati F, Sarno L, et al. Non-invasive prenatal testing: current perspectives and future challenges. Genes (Basel). 2020;12(1):15.

3. Eltabbakh N, Mohasin Y, Jeddy R. Advancements of non-invasive prenatal testing: the role of obstetricians. Front Med (Lausanne).

2024;11:1388481.

4. Liu Y, Liu H, He Y, et al. Clinical performance of non-invasive prenatal served as a first-tier screening test for trisomy 21, 18, 13 and sex chromosome aneuploidy in a pilot city in China. Hum Genomics. 2020;14(1):21.

5. Koçbulut E, Kurt A, Sarikaya Kurt D, Tolunay HE. Bibliometric analysis of publications on prenatal genetic screening using cell free DNA. Cureus. 2025;17(3):e80017.

6. Fan T, Zhang B. Mapping publication trends and knowledge structure on non-invasive prenatal testing–a bibliometric analysis. Front Genet. 2021;12:690559.

7. Zhang M, Zhou Y, Lu Y, He S, Liu M. The 100 most-cited articles on prenatal diagnosis: a bibliometric analysis. Medicine (Baltimore).

2019;98(38):e17236.

8. Gürbüz E, Aydemir S, Barlık F, et al. Bibliometric analysis of neurocysticercosis case reports and evaluation of presented cases. Microb Pathog. 2025;200:107315.

9. Tokur ME, Alkan S. Bibliometric analysis of scientific output growth in the field of lung transplantation. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024;72(4):300-310.

Published

2026-03-26

How to Cite

Güler, A. E., & Oral Yildiz, S. (2026). Bibliometric Analysis On Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: A Bibliometric Evaluation of Global Publication Trends, Citation Analysis, and Research Collaborations. Chronicles of Precision Medical Researchers, 7(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19242368

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.